Message337449
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Jess, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, rbcollins, remi.lapeyre, rhettinger |
| Date | 2019-03-08.04:15:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1552018534.76.0.410641537833.issue36230@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I think it should require only a a sort
It's possible to have non-sortable elements in the set, so you'll either need to sort on the repr of the elements or have a fallback:
assertSetEqual({10, None, 'abc'}, {20, 3+4j, 10}) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-03-08 04:15:34 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, michael.foord, remi.lapeyre, Jess |
| 2019-03-08 04:15:34 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1552018534.76.0.410641537833.issue36230@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-03-08 04:15:34 | rhettinger | link | issue36230 messages |
| 2019-03-08 04:15:34 | rhettinger | create | |