Message337500
| Author | jaraco |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jaraco, lemburg, pitrou |
| Date | 2019-03-08.16:12:32 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1552061552.75.0.667583853795.issue35967@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
[This answer](https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/307960/275034) is extremely helpful. `uname -p` isn't available on Linux except Fedora and late versions of Debian that apply the patch. This lack of consistency means that `platform.uname().processor` and thus `platform.processor()` is an inherently unreliable interface. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-03-08 16:12:32 | jaraco | set | recipients: + jaraco, lemburg, pitrou |
| 2019-03-08 16:12:32 | jaraco | set | messageid: <1552061552.75.0.667583853795.issue35967@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-03-08 16:12:32 | jaraco | link | issue35967 messages |
| 2019-03-08 16:12:32 | jaraco | create | |