Message339613
| Author | methane |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Aaron Hall, anthony shaw, methane, ncoghlan, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-04-08.11:20:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1554722411.42.0.652426741539.issue36551@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree with Serhiy. Benefit seems too small to add new opcode. > I could seek another way of implementing the same behaviour without an additional opcode? How about converting `[x for x in it]` to `[*it]` in AST? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-08 11:20:11 | methane | set | recipients: + methane, ronaldoussoren, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka, Aaron Hall, anthony shaw |
| 2019-04-08 11:20:11 | methane | set | messageid: <1554722411.42.0.652426741539.issue36551@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-08 11:20:11 | methane | link | issue36551 messages |
| 2019-04-08 11:20:11 | methane | create | |