Message340114
| Author | xdegaye |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Saim Raza, SilentGhost, barry, xdegaye |
| Date | 2019-04-12.21:32:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1555104775.19.0.405521672247.issue36537@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Now, I need to *inconveniently* put some dummy code after the ser_trace call every time I want to access the exception inside the except block Knowing that pdb stops just before the interpreter executes the line after pdb.set_trace(), what prevents you from writing the pdb.set_trace() statement before the last line of the except clause ? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-12 21:32:55 | xdegaye | set | recipients: + xdegaye, barry, SilentGhost, Saim Raza |
| 2019-04-12 21:32:55 | xdegaye | set | messageid: <1555104775.19.0.405521672247.issue36537@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-12 21:32:55 | xdegaye | link | issue36537 messages |
| 2019-04-12 21:32:55 | xdegaye | create | |