Message340284
| Author | p-ganssle |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ZackerySpytz, martin.panter, p-ganssle, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-04-15.15:09:11 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1555340951.73.0.894337627693.issue33632@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> In short, a+b can overflow, but a-b cannot? I think it's more that by always checking the elapsed time against `now() - starttime`, you never need to represent the time at which the timeout should happen - which may be so far in the future that it causes a signed overflow. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-15 15:09:11 | p-ganssle | set | recipients: + p-ganssle, pitrou, vstinner, martin.panter, ZackerySpytz |
| 2019-04-15 15:09:11 | p-ganssle | set | messageid: <1555340951.73.0.894337627693.issue33632@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-15 15:09:11 | p-ganssle | link | issue33632 messages |
| 2019-04-15 15:09:11 | p-ganssle | create | |