Message340295
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | chris.jerdonek, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, miss-islington, rbcollins, vstinner, xdegaye |
| Date | 2019-04-15.16:36:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1555346166.68.0.39666125436.issue16079@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Agreed, making duplicate method definitions a CI failure is the desired end state once our test suite is cleaned up and it doesn't have false positives. FYI - pylint also implements this check quite reliably as function-redefined via its pylint.checkers.base.BasicErrorChecker._check_redefinition() method. https://github.com/PyCQA/pylint/blob/2.2/pylint/checkers/base.py#L843 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-15 16:36:06 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, vstinner, rbcollins, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, chris.jerdonek, xdegaye, miss-islington |
| 2019-04-15 16:36:06 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1555346166.68.0.39666125436.issue16079@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-15 16:36:06 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue16079 messages |
| 2019-04-15 16:36:06 | gregory.p.smith | create | |