Message340617
| Author | Ellenbogen |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ellenbogen, alexandre.vassalotti, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-04-21.18:58:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1555873087.93.0.429278239455.issue36694@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Good point. I have created a new version of dump that uses random() instead. float reuse explains the getsizeof difference, but there is still a significant memory usage difference. This makes sense to me because the original code I saw this issue in is more analogous to random() |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-21 18:58:07 | Ellenbogen | set | recipients: + Ellenbogen, alexandre.vassalotti, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2019-04-21 18:58:07 | Ellenbogen | set | messageid: <1555873087.93.0.429278239455.issue36694@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-21 18:58:07 | Ellenbogen | link | issue36694 messages |
| 2019-04-21 18:58:07 | Ellenbogen | create | |