Message340942
| Author | jdemeyer |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eric.snow, jdemeyer, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-04-26.21:03:51 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1556312631.96.0.58634863819.issue36710@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> It's wrong to share a single gc state between two interpreters And what's your solution for that? I'm not asking for a complete ready-to-implement answer, but at least a basic idea. Otherwise it's impossible for me to judge whether your PR 12934 helps with that or not. Basically I would like to see something like PEP 579 but for this problem. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-04-26 21:03:51 | jdemeyer | set | recipients: + jdemeyer, vstinner, eric.snow |
| 2019-04-26 21:03:51 | jdemeyer | set | messageid: <1556312631.96.0.58634863819.issue36710@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-04-26 21:03:51 | jdemeyer | link | issue36710 messages |
| 2019-04-26 21:03:51 | jdemeyer | create | |