Message341466
| Author | eric.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | SilentGhost, barry, emilyemorehouse, eric.smith, larry, lukasz.langa, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, xtreak |
| Date | 2019-05-05.18:30:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1557081018.72.0.0698804542806.issue36798@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Because of the backward compatibility issues, I'm not going to change the f-string parser for this. We'll just need to document the requirements for using parens if you want to use :=. This is similar to the existing documentation about lambdas and f-strings in https://docs.python.org/3/reference/lexical_analysis.html#formatted-string-literals Patches welcome! To be clear: like lambdas, this is just limitation of embedding expressions inside strings, and it's also a limitation because format specs can start with equal signs. It's not a restriction because I think f-strings shouldn't contain "top-level" := expressions. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-05 18:30:18 | eric.smith | set | recipients: + eric.smith, barry, scoder, larry, SilentGhost, lukasz.langa, serhiy.storchaka, emilyemorehouse, xtreak |
| 2019-05-05 18:30:18 | eric.smith | set | messageid: <1557081018.72.0.0698804542806.issue36798@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-05 18:30:18 | eric.smith | link | issue36798 messages |
| 2019-05-05 18:30:18 | eric.smith | create | |