Message341569
| Author | pablogsal |
|---|---|
| Recipients | dino.viehland, eric.smith, eric.snow, giampaolo.rodola, njs, pablogsal, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-05-06.17:31:07 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1557163867.3.0.401274929347.issue36772@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I am +1 to this. Making it easier for the case of decorator factories that are called with all the defaults is a very common pattern in the wild. There are even known idioms for how to reduce the indentation of the naive approach (returning partials of the factory). In particular for lru_cache, my experience is that every time I teach this feature, people are confused initially about the '()' at the end of the call. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-06 17:31:07 | pablogsal | set | recipients: + pablogsal, rhettinger, scoder, eric.smith, giampaolo.rodola, dino.viehland, njs, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2019-05-06 17:31:07 | pablogsal | set | messageid: <1557163867.3.0.401274929347.issue36772@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-06 17:31:07 | pablogsal | link | issue36772 messages |
| 2019-05-06 17:31:07 | pablogsal | create | |