Message341700
| Author | remi.lapeyre |
|---|---|
| Recipients | belopolsky, josh.r, meador.inge, pitrou, remi.lapeyre, scoder, yselivanov |
| Date | 2019-05-07.08:57:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1557219432.41.0.614635148136.issue11107@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Hi josh.r, this may be dump but is there a reason not to make slices hashable? Couldn't they hash like a tuple (start, stop, step)? I looked around in the code, bpo and the mailing lists but could not find a reason why not, maybe it was just not useful at the time but could be implemented now? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-07 08:57:12 | remi.lapeyre | set | recipients: + remi.lapeyre, belopolsky, pitrou, scoder, meador.inge, yselivanov, josh.r |
| 2019-05-07 08:57:12 | remi.lapeyre | set | messageid: <1557219432.41.0.614635148136.issue11107@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-07 08:57:12 | remi.lapeyre | link | issue11107 messages |
| 2019-05-07 08:57:12 | remi.lapeyre | create | |