Message341881
| Author | p-ganssle |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ivan.Pozdeev, belopolsky, ericvw, fdrake, lemburg, p-ganssle, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-05-08.14:53:25 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1557327205.43.0.760813132938.issue35723@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> This sounds like a bug. Whether a tzinfo is a constant from a predefined set or something with a smart comparison semantic is none of datetime's business. I'm not sure what you mean, but it was not a "bug" in the sense that it was accidental, it was a deliberate choice. It comes at least partially from the fact that arithmetic operations attach the same timezone object to the new datetimes they create. When I first found out about this behavior, I raised bpo 28601. In any case, it's a side issue here, there are many other reasons pytz's model is incompatible with the preferred time zone model. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-08 14:53:25 | p-ganssle | set | recipients: + p-ganssle, lemburg, fdrake, belopolsky, vstinner, ericvw, Ivan.Pozdeev |
| 2019-05-08 14:53:25 | p-ganssle | set | messageid: <1557327205.43.0.760813132938.issue35723@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-08 14:53:25 | p-ganssle | link | issue35723 messages |
| 2019-05-08 14:53:25 | p-ganssle | create | |