Message343214
| Author | twisteroid ambassador |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Michael.Felt, asvetlov, eamanu, lepaperwan, maxifree, miss-islington, twisteroid ambassador, yselivanov |
| Date | 2019-05-22.16:24:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1558542282.67.0.666957024178.issue35545@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
With regards to the failing test, it looks like the test basically boils down to testing whether loop.getaddrinfo('fe80::1%1', 80, type=socket.SOCK_STREAM) returns (<socket.AF_INET6>, <socket.SOCK_STREAM>, *, *, ('fe80::1', 80, 0, 1)). This feels like a dangerous assumption to make, since it's tied to the operating system's behavior. Maybe AIX's getaddrinfo() in fact does not resolve scoped addresses correctly; maybe it only resolves scope ids correctly for real addresses that actually exist on the network; Maybe AIX assigns scope ids differently and do not use small integers; etc. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-22 16:24:42 | twisteroid ambassador | set | recipients: + twisteroid ambassador, asvetlov, yselivanov, Michael.Felt, lepaperwan, eamanu, miss-islington, maxifree |
| 2019-05-22 16:24:42 | twisteroid ambassador | set | messageid: <1558542282.67.0.666957024178.issue35545@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-22 16:24:42 | twisteroid ambassador | link | issue35545 messages |
| 2019-05-22 16:24:42 | twisteroid ambassador | create | |