Message343516
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | CyberJacob, Decorater, Matt Groth, ellisj, eric.araujo, lazka, mwh, ncoghlan, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka, tiagoaoa, tim.peters, undercoveridiot, vlasovskikh, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-05-25.21:19:46 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <3d109d52-adbf-0c7f-250e-af579d74f2ff@free.fr> |
| In-reply-to | <1558818583.51.0.823618242649.issue1230540@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Le 25/05/2019 à 23:09, STINNER Victor a écrit : > > I don't see the relationship between the API (signature) and the ability to set a per-thread hook. > > I'm not convinced that a per-thread hook is needed. Indeed, if you write your own Thread class, you can add a try...except in the Thread.run() method. You don't need a dedicated Thread.excepthook() method. The only way a per-thread hook could be useful is if you could set it *outside* of the Thread class (so not as a method), so that one can e.g. catch / report exceptions raised in threads launches by third-party libraries. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-25 21:19:46 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, mwh, tim.peters, ncoghlan, ellisj, vstinner, tiagoaoa, eric.araujo, undercoveridiot, vlasovskikh, serhiy.storchaka, lazka, Decorater, CyberJacob, Matt Groth |
| 2019-05-25 21:19:46 | pitrou | link | issue1230540 messages |
| 2019-05-25 21:19:46 | pitrou | create | |