Message343996
| Author | eric.snow |
|---|---|
| Recipients | dino.viehland, eric.snow, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-05-30.19:43:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1559245398.39.0.86697715856.issue36839@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
FWIW, I don't see the problem with supporting any read-only "buffer" object, rather than just bytes objects, for the string of bytes in a code object. That's all that Dino is proposing. The change is not invasive and solves a real need. The additional maintenance burden is negligible. Furthermore, the accommodation makes sense conceptually. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-30 19:43:18 | eric.snow | set | recipients: + eric.snow, dino.viehland, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2019-05-30 19:43:18 | eric.snow | set | messageid: <1559245398.39.0.86697715856.issue36839@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-30 19:43:18 | eric.snow | link | issue36839 messages |
| 2019-05-30 19:43:18 | eric.snow | create | |