Message343999
| Author | brett.cannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, methane, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2019-05-30.20:12:34 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1559247154.71.0.642473776163.issue36839@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I agree with Eric. While I understand what Serhiy is saying about code objects being more than a bytearray of bytecode, the buffer protocol is still a view on an object, and that view happens to be for a subset which I think is acceptable as I think of what a buffer of a code object would be other than the bytecode. I also think read-only is a good enough guarantee. We're talking low-level stuff here and if anyone were to muck with this stuff they are already playing with fire. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-05-30 20:12:34 | brett.cannon | set | recipients: + brett.cannon, dino.viehland, methane, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka |
| 2019-05-30 20:12:34 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1559247154.71.0.642473776163.issue36839@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-05-30 20:12:34 | brett.cannon | link | issue36839 messages |
| 2019-05-30 20:12:34 | brett.cannon | create | |