Message345265
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, emma_smith, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, levkivskyi, lukasz.langa, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-06-11.20:15:28 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1560284128.95.0.623260243624.issue35766@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> What will happen with Python 4? Why not using "full" Python version like (3, 4) or 0x304? I don't think Python 4 is just around the corner, so I prefer to kick that problem down the road. I'm sure we can come up with a sufficiently backwards-compatible API. (I'd prefer not to go the hex route, because printing the value would show as 52, which is pretty meaningless.) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-06-11 20:15:28 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, gregory.p.smith, vstinner, lukasz.langa, levkivskyi, Anthony Sottile, emma_smith |
| 2019-06-11 20:15:28 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1560284128.95.0.623260243624.issue35766@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-06-11 20:15:28 | gvanrossum | link | issue35766 messages |
| 2019-06-11 20:15:28 | gvanrossum | create | |