Message347362
| Author | nedbat |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aldwinaldwin, ned.deily, nedbat, pablogsal, serhiy.storchaka, xtreak |
| Date | 2019-07-05.17:26:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1562347598.07.0.531287066286.issue37500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The real-word implications from my world are this: if your code has "if 0:" clauses in it, and you measure its coverage, then because the lines have not been optimized away, coverage.py will think the lines are a possible execution path, and will be considered a miss because they are not executed. This will reduce your coverage percentage. I can't estimate how many people this will affect. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-07-05 17:26:38 | nedbat | set | recipients: + nedbat, ned.deily, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, xtreak, aldwinaldwin |
| 2019-07-05 17:26:38 | nedbat | set | messageid: <1562347598.07.0.531287066286.issue37500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-07-05 17:26:38 | nedbat | link | issue37500 messages |
| 2019-07-05 17:26:37 | nedbat | create | |