Message347477
| Author | paul.j3 |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Endre, berker.peksag, bethard, kapsh, paul.j3, xiang.zhang |
| Date | 2019-07-07.17:02:38 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1562518958.61.0.932882963608.issue26952@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Xiang Zhang pointed out that the immediate error in this case was caused by the empty mutually exclusive group: https://bugs.python.org/issue26952#msg264835 The nesting fails because adding actions to the argument_group does not enroll them in the mutually exclusive group. So the group._group_actions list remains empty, just as it is in your case. As I pointed out earlier, the usage formatter is brittle. The addition of mutually exclusive group markings is particularly clunky. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-07-07 17:02:38 | paul.j3 | set | recipients: + paul.j3, bethard, berker.peksag, xiang.zhang, Endre, kapsh |
| 2019-07-07 17:02:38 | paul.j3 | set | messageid: <1562518958.61.0.932882963608.issue26952@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-07-07 17:02:38 | paul.j3 | link | issue26952 messages |
| 2019-07-07 17:02:38 | paul.j3 | create | |