Message350233
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | eryksun, jeremy.kloth, jkloth, nanjekyejoannah, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-08-22.22:12:36 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1566511956.69.0.416637676571.issue37531@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> This is an issue when the standard handles are inherited or duplicated to a grandchild process, and so on. In the case of Popen(sys.executable), the system is duplicating the standard handles implicitly because sys.executable is a console process (assuming it's python[_d].exe), among other criteria. An additional reference on the write side prevents the pipe from closing. fh.read() in the grandparent won't return as long as there's a writer that could potentially write more data. Is there a way to workaround that? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-08-22 22:12:36 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, jkloth, jeremy.kloth, eryksun, nanjekyejoannah |
| 2019-08-22 22:12:36 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1566511956.69.0.416637676571.issue37531@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-08-22 22:12:36 | vstinner | link | issue37531 messages |
| 2019-08-22 22:12:36 | vstinner | create | |