Message350996
| Author | petr.viktorin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, jdemeyer, lukasz.langa, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-09-02.12:55:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1567428934.03.0.355357208086.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm not sure adding a check would solve this. What should be done when a function with func_code=NULL is called? "Silently do nothing" is not really an option; raising an exception wouldn't help much in this case. I wonder if a function's tp_clear we should clear the mutable parts (like func_closure) before the immutable ones (func_code). Any access to the immutable ones should have checks (and probably raise exceptions if those are NULL). |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-09-02 12:55:34 | petr.viktorin | set | recipients: + petr.viktorin, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer, pablogsal |
| 2019-09-02 12:55:34 | petr.viktorin | set | messageid: <1567428934.03.0.355357208086.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-09-02 12:55:34 | petr.viktorin | link | issue38006 messages |
| 2019-09-02 12:55:33 | petr.viktorin | create | |