Message351006
| Author | petr.viktorin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, christian.heimes, jdemeyer, lukasz.langa, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-09-02.14:46:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1567435577.39.0.906641061693.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> What downsides do we see raising an exception? Yeah, on second thought, that would probably be best. We still want PR #15641 as well, so the exception doesn't actually happen in practice. Note that _PyEval_EvalCodeWithName (the main use of func_globals) already fails with an exception if globals is NULL. > Either we remove tp_clear or somehow we have to protect all callers of the function. Technically, any field cleared from tp_cleared leaves the function in an inconsistent state tp_clear has a purpose; it prevents memory leaks. That leaves protecting access to the cleared fields. (But we don't need to clear func_name and func_qualname as these must be strings.) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-09-02 14:46:17 | petr.viktorin | set | recipients: + petr.viktorin, pitrou, vstinner, christian.heimes, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer, pablogsal |
| 2019-09-02 14:46:17 | petr.viktorin | set | messageid: <1567435577.39.0.906641061693.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-09-02 14:46:17 | petr.viktorin | link | issue38006 messages |
| 2019-09-02 14:46:17 | petr.viktorin | create | |