Message353142
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | cjw296, gregory.p.smith, lisroach, mariocj89, michael.foord, miss-islington, sfreilich, xtreak |
| Date | 2019-09-25.05:39:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1569389970.34.0.844408312783.issue36871@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
i believe the issues surfaces in this are fixed at this point. of note, my mock_call_test.py example now passes. i'm not entirely sure that it _should_ pass though, but that depends on what we want create_autospec of a class to do. should that autospec'd class require instantiation before methods are called? _that_ is outside the scope of this issue. As is, the current behavior is likely what people expect to find convenient. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-09-25 05:39:30 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, cjw296, michael.foord, lisroach, mariocj89, miss-islington, xtreak, sfreilich |
| 2019-09-25 05:39:30 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1569389970.34.0.844408312783.issue36871@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-09-25 05:39:30 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue36871 messages |
| 2019-09-25 05:39:29 | gregory.p.smith | create | |