Message353884
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, benjamin.peterson, christian.heimes, jdemeyer, larry, lukasz.langa, methane, miss-islington, nascheme, ned.deily, pablogsal, petr.viktorin, pitrou, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-10-03.22:41:55 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1570142515.57.0.762510366253.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Or even fatal error out? There's no reason to have Py_TPFLAGS_HAVE_GC but not implement tp_traverse, AFAIR. Well... It would prefer a smooth transition. Such sanity checks which mostly concerns developers perfectly fit the -X dev mode. I mean, calling Py_FatalError() only in development mode would be acceptable, rather than blocking the usage of C extensions which are working "perfectly well" on Python 3.7. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-10-03 22:41:55 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, tim.peters, nascheme, pitrou, larry, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, ned.deily, petr.viktorin, methane, lukasz.langa, Mark.Shannon, jdemeyer, pablogsal, miss-islington |
| 2019-10-03 22:41:55 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1570142515.57.0.762510366253.issue38006@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-10-03 22:41:55 | vstinner | link | issue38006 messages |
| 2019-10-03 22:41:55 | vstinner | create | |