Message356024
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, njs, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2019-11-05.11:08:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1572952096.94.0.596621333107.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I like the idea of exposing pidfd_open() syscall as os.pidfd_open(). Benjamin: Would you mind to create a PR based on your patch, but without your asyncio change? > +#ifndef __NR_pidfd_open I would prefer to avoid this part of the patch. You should accept an optional flags parameter, no? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-11-05 11:08:16 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, benjamin.peterson, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov |
| 2019-11-05 11:08:16 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1572952096.94.0.596621333107.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-11-05 11:08:16 | vstinner | link | issue38692 messages |
| 2019-11-05 11:08:16 | vstinner | create | |