Message356493
| Author | benjamin.peterson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aeros, asvetlov, benjamin.peterson, nanjekyejoannah, njs, vstinner, yan12125, yselivanov |
| Date | 2019-11-12.22:16:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1573596968.23.0.44732166758.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Sure, that change on it's own looks small and harmless. My point is that it's a slippery slope. Why is that sandbox configuration important enough to handle? It won't be tested by our CI and no one will know whether they can ever remove the EPERM skipping case. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-11-12 22:16:08 | benjamin.peterson | set | recipients: + benjamin.peterson, vstinner, njs, asvetlov, yselivanov, yan12125, nanjekyejoannah, aeros |
| 2019-11-12 22:16:08 | benjamin.peterson | set | messageid: <1573596968.23.0.44732166758.issue38692@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-11-12 22:16:08 | benjamin.peterson | link | issue38692 messages |
| 2019-11-12 22:16:08 | benjamin.peterson | create | |