Message356981
| Author | brett.cannon |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, brett.cannon, dino.viehland, eric.snow, fabioz, vstinner |
| Date | 2019-11-19.17:41:04 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1574185264.78.0.595964744088.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think the real question is whether this is part of the CPython public API or the CPython internal API. @Fabio how burdensome would it be if we placed this in the internal API that you can get access to but we don't make backwards-compatibility guarantees about? For instance, Victor wants to start passing in thread state which will change the API for 3.9, but we wouldn't expect to change it in a bugfix release. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-11-19 17:41:04 | brett.cannon | set | recipients: + brett.cannon, vstinner, fabioz, dino.viehland, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow |
| 2019-11-19 17:41:04 | brett.cannon | set | messageid: <1574185264.78.0.595964744088.issue38500@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-11-19 17:41:04 | brett.cannon | link | issue38500 messages |
| 2019-11-19 17:41:04 | brett.cannon | create | |