Message358445
| Author | tim.peters |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Marco Sulla, brandtbucher, cheryl.sabella, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, tim.peters |
| Date | 2019-12-15.20:20:51 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1576441251.56.0.820517922298.issue36095@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Closing as Mark suggested, but as "not a bug" rather than "won't fix". That floats aren't totally ordered is a consequence of IEEE 754 semantics, not Python's whim. As Mark said, if people want a total_ordering function for floats, that should be opened as a different issue - we're not going to change the default float comparison logic. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-12-15 20:20:51 | tim.peters | set | recipients: + tim.peters, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, cheryl.sabella, brandtbucher, Marco Sulla |
| 2019-12-15 20:20:51 | tim.peters | set | messageid: <1576441251.56.0.820517922298.issue36095@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-12-15 20:20:51 | tim.peters | link | issue36095 messages |
| 2019-12-15 20:20:51 | tim.peters | create | |