Message359916
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | vstinner |
| Date | 2020-01-13.16:09:54 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1578931794.31.0.282977314491.issue38644@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> One further step would be to change the VECTORCALL/FASTCALL calling convention to pass tstate. But I am not sure what is the risk to do that in Python 3.9? Cython uses FASTCALL internally for example. I started a thread on python-dev: https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/PIXJAJPWKDGHSQD65VOO2B7FDLU2QLHH/ I also wrote an article on this issue, "Pass the Python thread state explicitly": https://vstinner.github.io/cpython-pass-tstate.html |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-01-13 16:09:54 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner |
| 2020-01-13 16:09:54 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1578931794.31.0.282977314491.issue38644@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-01-13 16:09:54 | vstinner | link | issue38644 messages |
| 2020-01-13 16:09:54 | vstinner | create | |