Message360075
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Valentyn Tymofieiev, brett.cannon, eric.snow, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, p-ganssle, pablogsal, pitrou, vstinner |
| Date | 2020-01-15.21:27:52 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1579123672.99.0.505666638321.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The changes required to successfully do this backport are many and affect critical areas. I am not in a hurry to do this. If anyone else wants to take this up quickly, please do. Do you mean that there is a risk that the backport introduces a regression in another part of the code? If yes, I would suggest to not backport the change to *stable* branches. People survived with bug. Do you really *have to* backport the fix? Note: this issue is closed. If you consider to backport it, I suggest to reopen the issue. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-01-15 21:27:53 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, pitrou, eric.snow, p-ganssle, pablogsal, nanjekyejoannah, Valentyn Tymofieiev |
| 2020-01-15 21:27:52 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1579123672.99.0.505666638321.issue35943@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-01-15 21:27:52 | vstinner | link | issue35943 messages |
| 2020-01-15 21:27:52 | vstinner | create | |