Message364485
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, jeremy.kloth, jkloth, larry, maciej.szulik, nanjekyejoannah, ncoghlan, phsilva, rhettinger, shihai1991, vstinner |
| Date | 2020-03-17.22:09:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1584482999.07.0.0860750655891.issue39511@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I expect that for objects which are not commonly modified by two interpreters "at the same time", it should be fine. But None, True, small integer singletons, latin-1 str single character singletons, etc. objects are likely to be frequently accessed and so can become a bottleneck. Moreover, Python has an infamous feature: write (modify ob_refcnt) on "read-only" access :-D See "Copy-on-Read" feature popularized by Instagram ;-) https://instagram-engineering.com/copy-on-write-friendly-python-garbage-collection-ad6ed5233ddf |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-03-17 22:09:59 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, rhettinger, ncoghlan, larry, jkloth, phsilva, jeremy.kloth, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, maciej.szulik, nanjekyejoannah, shihai1991 |
| 2020-03-17 22:09:59 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1584482999.07.0.0860750655891.issue39511@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-03-17 22:09:59 | vstinner | link | issue39511 messages |
| 2020-03-17 22:09:59 | vstinner | create | |