Message365886
| Author | Mike Hommey |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mike Hommey, bquinlan, davin, diogocp, ned.deily, paul.moore, rbcollins, sbt, steve.dower, terry.reedy, tim.golden, tim.peters, zach.ware |
| Date | 2020-04-07.03:01:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1586228509.18.0.914875681356.issue26903@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
This is still a problem in python 3.7 (and, I guess 3.8). When not even giving a max_workers, it fails with a ValueError exception on _winapi.WaitForMultipleObjects, with the message "need at most 63 handles, got a sequence of length 63" That happens with max_workers=None and max_workers=61 ; not max_workers=60. I wonder if there's an off-by-one in this test: https://github.com/python/cpython/blob/7668a8bc93c2bd573716d1bea0f52ea520502b28/Modules/_winapi.c#L1708 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-04-07 03:01:49 | Mike Hommey | set | recipients: + Mike Hommey, tim.peters, terry.reedy, paul.moore, bquinlan, rbcollins, tim.golden, ned.deily, sbt, zach.ware, steve.dower, davin, diogocp |
| 2020-04-07 03:01:49 | Mike Hommey | set | messageid: <1586228509.18.0.914875681356.issue26903@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-04-07 03:01:49 | Mike Hommey | link | issue26903 messages |
| 2020-04-07 03:01:48 | Mike Hommey | create | |