Message366424
| Author | hniksic |
|---|---|
| Recipients | aeros, asvetlov, bquinlan, hniksic, pitrou, torsten |
| Date | 2020-04-14.18:30:12 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1586889012.61.0.174285933768.issue36780@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Thanks for the clarification, I didn't know about the change to non-daemon threads. I still think this patch is useful, and won't harm general use because it is opt-in, just like daemon threads themselves. I suggest to update the PR to specify non-waiting pool at the point of creation rather than in shutdown(). (That will also make it more acceptable for the same option not being supported for process pools - it is ok for constructor signatures to differ.) If there is interest, someone should take over the PR, as I have changed jobs and no longer have time to actively pursue this issue. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-04-14 18:30:12 | hniksic | set | recipients: + hniksic, bquinlan, pitrou, asvetlov, torsten, aeros |
| 2020-04-14 18:30:12 | hniksic | set | messageid: <1586889012.61.0.174285933768.issue36780@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-04-14 18:30:12 | hniksic | link | issue36780 messages |
| 2020-04-14 18:30:12 | hniksic | create | |