Message369662
| Author | Dennis Sweeney |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BTaskaya, Dennis Sweeney, aeros, asvetlov, carltongibson, chris.jerdonek, eamanu, felixxm, miss-islington, yselivanov |
| Date | 2020-05-22.22:27:10 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1590186430.76.0.460016828027.issue40696@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Wouldn't Floyd's or Brent's cycle detection algorithms be better here than the allocation of a new set? I believe they might also eliminate the need to fast-path the first 100 or however many. As in: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cycle_detection |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-05-22 22:27:10 | Dennis Sweeney | set | recipients: + Dennis Sweeney, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, yselivanov, eamanu, miss-islington, BTaskaya, aeros, carltongibson, felixxm |
| 2020-05-22 22:27:10 | Dennis Sweeney | set | messageid: <1590186430.76.0.460016828027.issue40696@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-05-22 22:27:10 | Dennis Sweeney | link | issue40696 messages |
| 2020-05-22 22:27:10 | Dennis Sweeney | create | |