Message371549
| Author | brandtbucher |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Aaron Hall, brandtbucher, chaburkland, curtisbucher, gvanrossum, josh.r, justjais, mark.dickinson, rhettinger, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, slam, steve.dower, xtreak |
| Date | 2020-06-15.14:24:33 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1592231074.43.0.0848175514044.issue36144@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Similar behavior was considered and ultimately rejected by the PEP as being too specialized: https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0584/#concatenate-values-in-a-list What you're asking for it subtly different, and even *more* specialized than that. I'd recommend just subclassing dict and overriding the operator, as the PEP suggests. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-06-15 14:24:34 | brandtbucher | set | recipients: + brandtbucher, gvanrossum, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, scoder, serhiy.storchaka, steve.dower, josh.r, Aaron Hall, slam, xtreak, curtisbucher, chaburkland, justjais |
| 2020-06-15 14:24:34 | brandtbucher | set | messageid: <1592231074.43.0.0848175514044.issue36144@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-06-15 14:24:34 | brandtbucher | link | issue36144 messages |
| 2020-06-15 14:24:33 | brandtbucher | create | |