Message373511
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Dima.Tisnek, JustAnotherArchivist, achimnol, asvetlov, bmerry, chris.jerdonek, gustavo, gvanrossum, socketpair, yselivanov |
| Date | 2020-07-11.03:48:08 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CAP7+vJJiw6iPOAM6Jno858q+oUr6PJxsx00=jbO0TgXO=jnQ0A@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1594437256.5.0.185446587393.issue32528@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Can you send a PR against what’s new 3.8? On Fri, Jul 10, 2020 at 20:14 JustAnotherArchivist <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > > JustAnotherArchivist <justanotherarchivist@riseup.net> added the comment: > > As another datapoint, this also broke some of my code on 3.8 because I was > using `concurrent.futures.CancelledError` rather than > `asyncio.CancelledError` to handle cancelled futures. And I'm certainly not > the only one to have done this given that it's mentioned in at least two > Stack Overflow answers: https://stackoverflow.com/a/38655063 and > https://stackoverflow.com/a/36277556 > > While I understand the rationale behind this change, it would've been good > to include this inheritance detail in the 3.8 release notes. > > ---------- > nosy: +JustAnotherArchivist > > _______________________________________ > Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org> > <https://bugs.python.org/issue32528> > _______________________________________ > -- --Guido (mobile) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-07-11 03:48:08 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, gustavo, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, socketpair, Dima.Tisnek, yselivanov, achimnol, bmerry, JustAnotherArchivist |
| 2020-07-11 03:48:08 | gvanrossum | link | issue32528 messages |
| 2020-07-11 03:48:08 | gvanrossum | create | |