Message383734
| Author | AR-Kareem |
|---|---|
| Recipients | AR-Kareem, eryksun |
| Date | 2020-12-25.11:03:58 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1608894238.53.0.777179576277.issue42730@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Shouldn't the behaviour for _thread.interrupt_main() be always to interrupt the main thread. I would expect that if a child thread uses _thread.interrupt_main() that the main thread be interrupted regardless of how the python script was invoked. Wouldn't it be more reasonable to make _thread.interrupt_main() always raise a SIGINT? I'm not sure if this is technically considered a bug or not, but it seems that it's not functioning as intended even in Python 3.7 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-12-25 11:03:58 | AR-Kareem | set | recipients: + AR-Kareem, eryksun |
| 2020-12-25 11:03:58 | AR-Kareem | set | messageid: <1608894238.53.0.777179576277.issue42730@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-12-25 11:03:58 | AR-Kareem | link | issue42730 messages |
| 2020-12-25 11:03:58 | AR-Kareem | create | |