Message385518
| Author | steve.dower |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, ammar2, christian.heimes, lunixbochs2, steve.dower, vstinner |
| Date | 2021-01-23.00:33:41 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <ef94cb11-3cba-658f-8188-8ea87f415308@python.org> |
| In-reply-to | <1611360061.44.0.985597923993.issue42800@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> I think it could make sense to: > 1. Alias READ_RESTRICTED to a new READ_AUDIT flag and use the latter instead, as it is more clear. > 2. Update the newtype docs to mention READ_AUDIT and remove documentation for the the unused RESTRICTED flags. > 3. Deprecate the non-functional RESTRICTED flags if that's possible? > 4. Only cross the setattr/delattr audit flag bridge if a future refactor calls for it. Sounds good to me. We can deprecate RESTRICTED with no intention to remove it, since it's documented. Do you want to prepare a PR for this? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-01-23 00:33:41 | steve.dower | set | recipients: + steve.dower, vstinner, christian.heimes, Mark.Shannon, ammar2, lunixbochs2 |
| 2021-01-23 00:33:41 | steve.dower | link | issue42800 messages |
| 2021-01-23 00:33:41 | steve.dower | create | |