Message386701
| Author | avrahami.ben |
|---|---|
| Recipients | avrahami.ben, levkivskyi, rectalogic, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2021-02-09.09:57:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1612864626.56.0.487205262672.issue36517@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
The patch PR blocks out a useful idiom: generic Nametuple >>> class LLNode(NamedTuple, Generic[T]): ... value :T ... next: Optional[LLNode[T]] I put forward that, at the least, NamedTuple should accept do-nothing bases like Generic. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-02-09 09:57:06 | avrahami.ben | set | recipients: + avrahami.ben, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, levkivskyi, rectalogic |
| 2021-02-09 09:57:06 | avrahami.ben | set | messageid: <1612864626.56.0.487205262672.issue36517@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-02-09 09:57:06 | avrahami.ben | link | issue36517 messages |
| 2021-02-09 09:57:06 | avrahami.ben | create | |