Message387158
| Author | pablogsal |
|---|---|
| Recipients | CuriousLearner, corona10, eric.smith, iritkatriel, ncoghlan, nitishch, pablogsal, piyushhajare, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, xtreak |
| Date | 2021-02-17.14:14:57 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1613571297.45.0.119271375843.issue34013@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Would it be too much if add a Python 2 rule for print statement in grammar to produce better error message? Please, go ahead. I think it makes sense and with our latest change in the parser, such new error message will have no impact on performance whatsoever. Please, at me as a reviewer :) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-02-17 14:14:57 | pablogsal | set | recipients: + pablogsal, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, eric.smith, serhiy.storchaka, CuriousLearner, corona10, nitishch, xtreak, piyushhajare, iritkatriel |
| 2021-02-17 14:14:57 | pablogsal | set | messageid: <1613571297.45.0.119271375843.issue34013@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-02-17 14:14:57 | pablogsal | link | issue34013 messages |
| 2021-02-17 14:14:57 | pablogsal | create | |