Message 388550 - Python tracker

Message388550

Author gousaiyang
Recipients christian.heimes, gousaiyang, miss-islington, pablogsal, steve.dower, vstinner, zkonge
Date 2021-03-12.20:48:21
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1615582102.02.0.844290944949.issue43439@roundup.psfhosted.org>
In-reply-to
Content
In addition to the consistency with existing audit hook signatures, there may also be another benefit of wrapping it with a tuple of length 1. If gc.get_referrers or gc.get_referents happens to gain a new keyword-only argument in the future, we may need to add the new argument to the hook args. Extending the `(objs,)` tuple to `(objs, new_kwarg)` is a bit more elegant than appending the `new_kwarg` to the end of the `objs` tuple itself (considering a hook function which tries to be compatible with both the old and the new signature).
History
Date User Action Args
2021-03-12 20:48:22gousaiyangsetrecipients: + gousaiyang, vstinner, christian.heimes, steve.dower, pablogsal, miss-islington, zkonge
2021-03-12 20:48:22gousaiyangsetmessageid: <1615582102.02.0.844290944949.issue43439@roundup.psfhosted.org>
2021-03-12 20:48:22gousaiyanglinkissue43439 messages
2021-03-12 20:48:21gousaiyangcreate