Message389201
| Author | gregory.p.smith |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Ofekmeister, eryksun, giampaolo.rodola, gregory.p.smith, paul.moore, steve.dower, tarek, tim.golden, yuliu, zach.ware |
| Date | 2021-03-20.23:53:14 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1616284394.08.0.835664153681.issue33240@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
oh, I missed that a notification happens to the other process(es) in a common case, a bit of retrying with backoff would actually make sense there. But I wouldn't let a retry run for longer than a second or three, as code tends to assume that rmtree is pretty quick and if something is going to close asynchronously, it should close quickly. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-03-20 23:53:14 | gregory.p.smith | set | recipients: + gregory.p.smith, paul.moore, giampaolo.rodola, tim.golden, tarek, zach.ware, eryksun, steve.dower, Ofekmeister, yuliu |
| 2021-03-20 23:53:14 | gregory.p.smith | set | messageid: <1616284394.08.0.835664153681.issue33240@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-03-20 23:53:14 | gregory.p.smith | link | issue33240 messages |
| 2021-03-20 23:53:14 | gregory.p.smith | create | |