Message389369
| Author | terry.reedy |
|---|---|
| Recipients | ajaksu2, benjamin.peterson, dmalcolm, ezio.melotti, oliver_gramberg, pablogsal, rhettinger, sean_gillespie, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy |
| Date | 2021-03-23.02:50:18 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1616467820.39.0.0724131043263.issue1634034@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think that this issue should be closed as 'out of date' as it was pretty open-ended and it is unclear what request remains.
For the specific case "for a in (8,9)", the suggested "expected ':'" has been added on another issue. I expect that there are other additions from other issues.
For "for a in (8,9: print a," there is no change but for "for a in (8,9]" we now have "closing parenthesis ']' does not match opening parenthesis '('". This properly does not say that "expected ')'" as the needed fix might be to insert opener '['.
For many other cases, the proposed additions were disputed as not helpful, mostly because multiple things could be expected. I think other suggestions, based on current master, should be new issues. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-03-23 02:50:20 | terry.reedy | set | recipients: + terry.reedy, rhettinger, sean_gillespie, ajaksu2, oliver_gramberg, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, dmalcolm, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal |
| 2021-03-23 02:50:20 | terry.reedy | set | messageid: <1616467820.39.0.0724131043263.issue1634034@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-03-23 02:50:20 | terry.reedy | link | issue1634034 messages |
| 2021-03-23 02:50:18 | terry.reedy | create | |