Message394452
| Author | Nils Kattenbeck |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Nils Kattenbeck, amaury.forgeotdarc, atuining, benjamin.peterson, brett.cannon, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, gpolo, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger |
| Date | 2021-05-26.17:49:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1622051367.17.0.80631082602.issue1717@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Has there been any resolution regarding `sortTestMethodsUsing`? See https://bugs.python.org/msg77261 I spend a decent time and read the documentation thrice before realizing it received an old-style compare function. Brett's proposal for a new attribute seems like a sane way to do this without breaking backwards compatibility. Or will this continue using an old-style compare function for the foreseeable future? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-05-26 17:49:27 | Nils Kattenbeck | set | recipients: + Nils Kattenbeck, lemburg, brett.cannon, georg.brandl, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, atuining, pitrou, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, gpolo, python-dev |
| 2021-05-26 17:49:27 | Nils Kattenbeck | set | messageid: <1622051367.17.0.80631082602.issue1717@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-05-26 17:49:27 | Nils Kattenbeck | link | issue1717 messages |
| 2021-05-26 17:49:27 | Nils Kattenbeck | create | |