Message396715
| Author | kj |
|---|---|
| Recipients | JelleZijlstra, farcat, gvanrossum, kj |
| Date | 2021-06-29.11:55:16 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1624967716.25.0.745055557332.issue44524@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Is this intentional? It seems a little inconsistent. The `__name__` attribute is for internal use only. It's subject to change every release along with other implementation details. Sorry, I don't really understand what this issue is requesting. Do you want to add the `split_module_names` function or standardize `__name__` or something else? Depending on what you're suggesting the follow up would be different. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-06-29 11:55:16 | kj | set | recipients: + kj, gvanrossum, farcat, JelleZijlstra |
| 2021-06-29 11:55:16 | kj | set | messageid: <1624967716.25.0.745055557332.issue44524@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-06-29 11:55:16 | kj | link | issue44524 messages |
| 2021-06-29 11:55:16 | kj | create | |