Message400270
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | FFY00, brandtbucher, jefferyto, lukasz.langa, methane, obfusk, pablogsal, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2021-08-25.14:14:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1629900869.65.0.585030532604.issue37596@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Looking again, I think code is correct as-is (am not sure about the depth adjustment though). Stylistically, it is different from the other blocks w_complex_object() that always have a "return" after setting p->error. The new code jumps to "anyset_done" and then falls through the "elif" block rather than issuing a "return". Since nothing else happens below the if-elif-else chain, this is without consequence. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-08-25 14:14:29 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, methane, lukasz.langa, serhiy.storchaka, pablogsal, brandtbucher, FFY00, jefferyto, obfusk |
| 2021-08-25 14:14:29 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1629900869.65.0.585030532604.issue37596@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-08-25 14:14:29 | rhettinger | link | issue37596 messages |
| 2021-08-25 14:14:29 | rhettinger | create | |