Message401423
| Author | erlendaasland |
|---|---|
| Recipients | berker.peksag, corona10, erlendaasland, miss-islington, petr.viktorin |
| Date | 2021-09-08.20:49:37 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1631134177.65.0.259513372613.issue42064@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I did some experiments using the connection object as a "backref" in the callback context, but it seems that the GC does not play well with such ref circles; I ended up with a lot of ref leaks (yes, I modified the traverse and clear slots to visit and clear the backref). Using the module object as a "backref", however, worked swell. It ends up being a much larger PR, though. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-09-08 20:49:37 | erlendaasland | set | recipients: + erlendaasland, petr.viktorin, berker.peksag, corona10, miss-islington |
| 2021-09-08 20:49:37 | erlendaasland | set | messageid: <1631134177.65.0.259513372613.issue42064@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-09-08 20:49:37 | erlendaasland | link | issue42064 messages |
| 2021-09-08 20:49:37 | erlendaasland | create | |