Message402000
| Author | rhettinger |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brandtbucher, jaraco, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka |
| Date | 2021-09-17.03:58:39 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Subclass of set can now define a __new__() method with > additional keyword parameters without overriding also __init__(). Is there any use case for this? Offhand, I can't think of any reason. The new code in set.__init__ is somewhat opaque and is likely slower, so I prefer the previous code unless there is a legitimate use case being served. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-09-17 03:58:39 | rhettinger | set | recipients: + rhettinger, jaraco, serhiy.storchaka, brandtbucher |
| 2021-09-17 03:58:39 | rhettinger | set | messageid: <1631851119.27.0.970065286126.issue43413@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-09-17 03:58:39 | rhettinger | link | issue43413 messages |
| 2021-09-17 03:58:39 | rhettinger | create | |