Message409974
| Author | n_rosenstein |
|---|---|
| Recipients | BTaskaya, eric.smith, gvanrossum, joperez, kj, levkivskyi, lukasz.langa, miss-islington, n_rosenstein |
| Date | 2022-01-07.15:17:19 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1641568639.76.0.556379848031.issue41370@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I'm running into this issue right now. Can anyone provide a rationale as to why you think this is acceptable/expected behaviour? Do we expect developers to semi-rely on get_type_hints(), but than still having to manually resolve forward references in PEP585 generic aliases? That seems broken to me. Thanks, Niklas R. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-01-07 15:17:19 | n_rosenstein | set | recipients: + n_rosenstein, gvanrossum, eric.smith, lukasz.langa, levkivskyi, miss-islington, BTaskaya, joperez, kj |
| 2022-01-07 15:17:19 | n_rosenstein | set | messageid: <1641568639.76.0.556379848031.issue41370@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-01-07 15:17:19 | n_rosenstein | link | issue41370 messages |
| 2022-01-07 15:17:19 | n_rosenstein | create | |