Message411691
| Author | gvanrossum |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Anthony Sottile, GBeauregard, JelleZijlstra, gvanrossum, kj, miss-islington |
| Date | 2022-01-26.00:13:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1643155986.27.0.985899531104.issue46491@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Well that's *always* a problem right? If you take that to the extreme we wouldn't need bugfix releases. :-) Apart from some examples in the 3.5-3.6 timeframe, what makes you think that *this* fix *specifically* is going to make more people unhappy than it makes happy? When people complain that they wrote Annotated[ClassVar[int], ...] and are disappointed that it doesn't work in a certain old version, you can just tell them to use ClassVar[Annotated[int, ...]] which is in no way invalid or inferior and works in all versions that support Annotated. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-01-26 00:13:06 | gvanrossum | set | recipients: + gvanrossum, JelleZijlstra, Anthony Sottile, miss-islington, kj, GBeauregard |
| 2022-01-26 00:13:06 | gvanrossum | set | messageid: <1643155986.27.0.985899531104.issue46491@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-01-26 00:13:06 | gvanrossum | link | issue46491 messages |
| 2022-01-26 00:13:06 | gvanrossum | create | |